What we know about the measurement:

Optimal Audio Cuboid 10 is a passive bookshelves that cost around 660 USD each.

  • Quality of the measurement data is low.
  • Origin of the data is Optimal Audio.
  • Format of the data is a GLL file .
  • -3dB (resp. -6db) point v.s. reference is at 47.5Hz (resp. 42.5Hz).
  • Reference level is normalised to -0.1dB computed over the frequency range [300.0Hz, 5000.0Hz].
  • Frequency deviation is 3.8dB over the same frequency range.
  • Tonality (Preference) Score
    • Tonality (Preference) Score is 3.36 and would be 5.42 with a perfect subwoofer.
      • Details: NBD: ON 0.614, LW 0.602, SP 0.71, PIR 0.646; SM: SP0.662, PIR0.52; LFQ 0.772, LFX 43Hz
    • Tonality (Preference) Score is 5.58 with an EQ and would be 7.42 with a perfect subwoofer and the same EQ.
      • Details: NBD: ON 0.44, LW 0.41, SP 0.49, PIR 0.428; SM: SP0.919, PIR0.913; LFQ 0.772, LFX 38Hz
  • Vendor specifications:
    • Dispersion: 90° horizontal and 50° vertical.
    • Sensitivity 96 dB
    • Impedance 8 Ohm
    • SPL
      • max: 120 dB
      • peak: 126 dB
    • Size
      • Width 322mm
      • Height 524mm
      • Depth 326mm
    • Weight 16.0kg
Optimal Audio Cuboid 10
AutomaticEQ (IIR)
Set preamp gain to: -2.3dB.
Type Freq Q Gain
PK 42.0 1.91 2.98
PK 74.0 1.85 -5.03
PK 160.0 0.82 -1.88
PK 3068.0 3.0 3.0
PK 5165.0 2.96 -4.0
PK 8397.0 1.21 -4.06
PK 13652.0 2.98 -3.83
Download

These EQ optimise the Harman score and is a good start for far field listening like in your living room.

Optimal Audio Cuboid 10 filters_auto_eq

AutomaticEQ

Optimal Audio Cuboid 10 filters_eq_full

Target v.s. EQ

Optimal Audio Cuboid 10
AutomaticEQ LW (IIR)
Set preamp gain to: -2.3dB.
Type Freq Q Gain
PK 47.0 2.99 2.99
PK 74.0 1.51 -4.93
PK 178.0 1.02 -1.81
PK 976.0 3.0 2.06
PK 1760.0 2.59 -2.05
PK 3068.0 2.86 3.0
PK 7308.0 0.89 -2.21
Download

These EQ optimise for a flat listening window and is a good start for near field listening like on your desk.

Optimal Audio Cuboid 10: comparison between EQs
Optimal Audio Cuboid 10

Comparison betweens various EQs

Optimal Audio Cuboid 10

Improvements made by EQ
CEA2034
CEA2034 Normalized
On Axis
Early Reflections
Estimated In-Room Response
Horizontal Reflections
Vertical Reflections
SPL Horizontal
SPL Vertical
SPL Horizontal Normalized
SPL Vertical Normalized
SPL Horizontal Contour
SPL Vertical Contour
SPL Horizontal Contour Normalized
SPL Vertical Contour Normalized
SPL Horizontal Contour 3D
SPL Vertical Contour 3D
SPL Horizontal Contour Normalized 3D
SPL Vertical Contour Normalized 3D
SPL Horizontal Radar
SPL Vertical Radar
CEA2034
CEA2034 Normalized
On Axis
Early Reflections
Estimated In-Room Response
Horizontal Reflections
Vertical Reflections
SPL Horizontal
SPL Vertical
SPL Horizontal Normalized
SPL Vertical Normalized
SPL Horizontal Contour
SPL Vertical Contour
SPL Horizontal Contour Normalized
SPL Vertical Contour Normalized
SPL Horizontal Contour 3D
SPL Vertical Contour 3D
SPL Horizontal Contour Normalized 3D
SPL Vertical Contour Normalized 3D
SPL Horizontal Radar
SPL Vertical Radar
Frequency Frequency with EQ
Frequency Frequency with EQ
Frequency Frequency with EQ
Frequency Frequency with EQ
Frequency Frequency with EQ
Frequency Frequency with EQ
Frequency Frequency with EQ
Frequency Frequency with EQ
Frequency Frequency with EQ
Frequency Frequency with EQ
Frequency Frequency with EQ
;