What we know about the measurement:
- Quality of the measurement data is
low.
-
Origin of the data is Misc.
-
Format of the data is
a scanned image
.
-
Sensitivity: 86.0dB (avg. 100Hz-1kHz for 2.83V estimated at 1m)
-
-3dB (resp. -6db) point v.s. reference is at 200.0Hz (resp. 198.6Hz).
-
Reference level is normalised to 0.3dB
computed over the frequency range [300.0Hz,
5000.0Hz].
-
Frequency deviation is 3.3dB over the same frequency range.
- Tonality (Preference) Score
- Tonality (Preference) Score is 1.57
and would be 6.47 with a
perfect subwoofer.
- Details:
NBD: ON 0.496,
LW 0.378, SP
0.574, PIR
0.421; SM:
SP0.786,
PIR0.556; LFQ
10.0, LFX 198Hz
- Tonality (Preference) Score is 3.37
with an EQ and would be 8.27 with a
perfect subwoofer and the same EQ.
- Details:
NBD: ON 0.367,
LW 0.231, SP
0.336, PIR
0.179; SM:
SP0.905,
PIR0.882; LFQ 10.0, LFX 198Hz
- Link to Original review.
|
AutomaticEQ (IIR)
|
|
Set preamp gain to: -2.4dB.
|
| Type |
Freq |
Q |
Gain |
| 3 |
200.0 |
0.95 |
-1.76 |
| 3 |
200.0 |
2.66 |
2.82 |
| 3 |
342.0 |
1.79 |
1.68 |
| 3 |
604.0 |
1.47 |
1.85 |
| 3 |
817.0 |
3.0 |
-3.0 |
| 3 |
1348.0 |
1.74 |
-2.51 |
| 3 |
1948.0 |
2.99 |
3.0 |
| 3 |
3930.0 |
2.44 |
-1.86 |
| 3 |
10713.0 |
0.26 |
1.57 |
|
Download
|
These EQ optimise the Harman score and is a good start for far field listening like in your living room.
AutomaticEQ
Target v.s. EQ
|
Graphic EQ 15 bands
|
|
Set preamp gain to: -0.8dB.
|
| Type |
Freq |
Q |
Gain |
| 3 |
25.0 |
2.14 |
0.0 |
| 3 |
40.0 |
2.14 |
0.0 |
| 3 |
63.0 |
2.14 |
0.0 |
| 3 |
100.0 |
2.14 |
0.0 |
| 3 |
160.0 |
2.14 |
0.0 |
| 3 |
250.0 |
2.14 |
0.25 |
| 3 |
400.0 |
2.14 |
0.5 |
| 3 |
630.0 |
2.14 |
0.25 |
| 3 |
1000.0 |
2.14 |
-0.25 |
| 3 |
1600.0 |
2.14 |
0.0 |
| 3 |
2500.0 |
2.14 |
0.25 |
| 3 |
4000.0 |
2.14 |
-0.25 |
| 3 |
6300.0 |
2.14 |
0.25 |
| 3 |
10000.0 |
2.14 |
0.25 |
| 3 |
16000.0 |
2.14 |
0.75 |
|
Download
|
These EQ is designed for a 15 bands graphical EQ.
|
Graphic EQ 31 bands
|
|
Set preamp gain to: -0.5dB.
|
| Type |
Freq |
Q |
Gain |
| 3 |
20.0 |
4.32 |
0.0 |
| 3 |
25.0 |
4.32 |
0.0 |
| 3 |
31.0 |
4.32 |
0.0 |
| 3 |
40.0 |
4.32 |
0.0 |
| 3 |
50.0 |
4.32 |
0.0 |
| 3 |
63.0 |
4.32 |
0.0 |
| 3 |
80.0 |
4.32 |
0.0 |
| 3 |
100.0 |
4.32 |
0.0 |
| 3 |
125.0 |
4.32 |
0.0 |
| 3 |
160.0 |
4.32 |
0.0 |
| 3 |
200.0 |
4.32 |
0.0 |
| 3 |
250.0 |
4.32 |
0.25 |
| 3 |
315.0 |
4.32 |
0.25 |
| 3 |
400.0 |
4.32 |
0.25 |
| 3 |
500.0 |
4.32 |
0.25 |
| 3 |
630.0 |
4.32 |
0.25 |
| 3 |
800.0 |
4.32 |
-0.25 |
| 3 |
1000.0 |
4.32 |
-0.25 |
| 3 |
1250.0 |
4.32 |
0.0 |
| 3 |
1600.0 |
4.32 |
0.0 |
| 3 |
2000.0 |
4.32 |
0.5 |
| 3 |
2500.0 |
4.32 |
0.0 |
| 3 |
3150.0 |
4.32 |
0.0 |
| 3 |
4000.0 |
4.32 |
-0.25 |
| 3 |
5000.0 |
4.32 |
0.0 |
| 3 |
6300.0 |
4.32 |
0.25 |
| 3 |
8000.0 |
4.32 |
0.25 |
| 3 |
10000.0 |
4.32 |
0.0 |
| 3 |
12000.0 |
4.32 |
0.0 |
| 3 |
16000.0 |
4.32 |
0.5 |
| 3 |
20000.0 |
4.32 |
0.0 |
|
Download
|
These EQ is designed for a 31 bands graphical EQ.
Comparison betweens various EQs
Improvements made by EQ
|
