What we know about the measurement:

GedLee Nathan is a passive bookshelves

  • Quality of the measurement data is low.
  • Origin of the data is Princeton.
  • Format of the data is .
  • Link to Original review.
GedLee Nathan
AutomaticEQ (IIR)
Set preamp gain to: -2.4dB.
Type Freq Q Gain
PK 40.0 0.29 2.59
PK 105.0 2.78 -5.52
PK 504.0 2.28 -7.49
PK 689.0 0.75 -6.37
PK 2406.0 1.77 -1.2
PK 3405.0 0.75 -3.91
PK 13652.0 2.85 0.67
Download
This EQ optimise the Harman score and is a good start for far field listening like in your living room.
GedLee Nathan
Graphic EQ 15 bands
Set preamp gain to: -1.1dB.
Type Freq Q Gain
PK 25.0 2.14 0.0
PK 40.0 2.14 0.0
PK 63.0 2.14 0.0
PK 100.0 2.14 0.0
PK 160.0 2.14 0.0
PK 250.0 2.14 0.0
PK 400.0 2.14 0.0
PK 630.0 2.14 0.75
PK 1000.0 2.14 0.25
PK 1600.0 2.14 0.75
PK 2500.0 2.14 0.25
PK 4000.0 2.14 0.0
PK 6300.0 2.14 0.75
PK 10000.0 2.14 1.0
PK 16000.0 2.14 -0.5
Download
This EQ is designed for a 15 bands graphical EQ.
GedLee Nathan
Graphic EQ 31 bands
Set preamp gain to: -0.4dB.
Type Freq Q Gain
PK 20.0 4.32 0.0
PK 25.0 4.32 0.0
PK 31.0 4.32 0.0
PK 40.0 4.32 0.0
PK 50.0 4.32 0.0
PK 63.0 4.32 0.0
PK 80.0 4.32 0.0
PK 100.0 4.32 0.0
PK 125.0 4.32 0.0
PK 160.0 4.32 0.0
PK 200.0 4.32 0.0
PK 250.0 4.32 0.0
PK 315.0 4.32 0.0
PK 400.0 4.32 0.0
PK 500.0 4.32 0.0
PK 630.0 4.32 0.25
PK 800.0 4.32 0.0
PK 1000.0 4.32 0.0
PK 1250.0 4.32 0.25
PK 1600.0 4.32 0.25
PK 2000.0 4.32 0.25
PK 2500.0 4.32 0.0
PK 3150.0 4.32 0.0
PK 4000.0 4.32 0.0
PK 5000.0 4.32 0.25
PK 6300.0 4.32 0.25
PK 8000.0 4.32 0.25
PK 10000.0 4.32 0.25
PK 12000.0 4.32 0.25
PK 16000.0 4.32 -0.25
PK 20000.0 4.32 0.0
Download
This EQ is designed for a 31 bands graphical EQ.
Improvement made by adding the above EQ
EQ
AutoEQ
Target v.s. EQ
Target v.s. EQ
Histogram of errors
On Axis (fullrange)
Listening Window (fullrange)
Predicted In-Room Response (fullrange)
GedLee Nathan: comparison between EQs
AutomaticEQ
Target v.s. EQ
Comparison betweens various EQs
;